Denneroll Spinal Orthotics
What it is
The spine maintains two forward curves, called lordoses (the inward curve of the neck and low back), and two backward curves, called kyphoses (the mid-back and sacral region). When these curves flatten or reverse, mechanical stress concentrates on the intervertebral discs and posterior joints, accelerating degenerative change and altering the biomechanics of every segment above and below the affected region. Denneroll spinal orthotics are purpose-engineered, contoured devices that position the spine in a corrective arc during a timed lying session, typically fifteen to twenty minutes, allowing gravitational and body-weight forces to apply a gentle, sustained stretch to shortened ligamentous and soft-tissue structures.
The device is available in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar configurations, each shaped to match the target curvature the clinician is working to restore. Placement is precise: the apex of the orthotic must sit at the correct vertebral level to load the intended segment rather than an adjacent one. This distinguishes the Denneroll from a generic foam roller or wedge. The physics involved are the same creep and stress-relaxation principles that govern orthodontic tooth movement — steady, low-load, prolonged force produces lasting tissue change, while high-force brief loading produces only temporary displacement. [5] The Chiropractic BioPhysics technique provides the measurement framework, using full-spine radiographic analysis to determine ideal curvature targets and to track progress objectively over the correction phase.
What to expect
Before the first Denneroll session, Dr. Brett A. Moss reviews postural and radiographic measurements to select the correct device configuration and to mark the precise spinal level that needs to be loaded. The session itself is straightforward: the patient lies supine (face-up) on the orthotic, which sits on a firm table surface. Gravity and body weight do the corrective work. Most patients notice a mild stretch or pressure sensation during the first several sessions; this diminishes as spinal flexibility improves and the curve begins to change. Sessions are typically performed in-office following a chiropractic adjustment, because the adjustment temporarily reduces joint stiffness and may allow the orthotic to act on more pliable tissues. [8]
A complete correction program usually spans weeks to months depending on the severity of the curve loss and the patient's tissue adaptability. Progress is measured at regular intervals using the same postural and radiometric landmarks established at baseline. [5] Home-use Denneroll protocols are sometimes prescribed as an adjunct to in-office care, extending the cumulative load time between appointments. Patients beginning a course of care can review what a full plan involves at our services.
Key benefits
- Sustained positional loading through the Denneroll has been associated with measurable increases in cervical and lumbar lordotic angle over a structured correction period. [5]
- Restoring normal spinal curvature redistributes compressive load more evenly across the disc and facet joint surfaces, reducing the focal stress that contributes to degenerative disc disease over time. [8]
- Patients with cervicogenic headache, meaning headache originating from structures in the cervical spine, showed significant reductions in headache frequency in a controlled trial using the Denneroll traction device as part of a multimodal protocol. [8]
- Because the device works through gravity and positioning rather than manual force, it can be applied consistently session after session with a reproducible load, which is difficult to achieve with manual traction alone. [5]
- Combining Denneroll use with Corrective Exercise corrective exercise reinforces the structural gains by strengthening the deep postural muscles that hold the restored curve in place between sessions.
- Objective measurement of curvature before and after a correction program gives both the clinician and patient a concrete, radiographically verifiable record of structural change rather than a subjective impression of improvement. [5]
Who benefits most
The patients most likely to benefit from Denneroll orthotics are those whose imaging reveals measurable loss of cervical or lumbar lordosis, anterior head carriage (the forward displacement of the skull relative to the shoulders), or a hypolordotic (abnormally flattened) thoracic curve. These structural findings commonly accompany chronic Neck Pain neck pain, tension-type and cervicogenic headaches, and persistent Low Back Pain low back pain that has not resolved with standard care. Patients who spend extended hours at a desk or in a forward-flexed posture are disproportionately represented in this group, because sustained flexion loading compresses the anterior disc and gradually remodels ligaments into a shortened, lengthened-posterior configuration.
Denneroll care is not appropriate for patients with acute fracture, severe osteoporosis, active infection of spinal structures, or cord compression requiring surgical evaluation. Patients who have recently undergone spinal fusion require a careful review of surgical records before any corrective traction is applied. Age alone is not a contraindication; adults across a wide age range have demonstrated curve improvement when tissue integrity is adequate and care is progressed appropriately. Teenagers and younger adults tend to respond faster because ligamentous structures are more viscoelastic, but older patients with moderate flexibility can still achieve clinically meaningful curvature change with a longer correction timeline.
How it connects to chiropractic
Denneroll orthotics occupy a specific niche within evidence-based structural correction: they are the primary instrument through which Chiropractic BioPhysics practitioners apply mirror-image traction to the spine. CBP is the most published chiropractic technique system, with peer-reviewed studies examining its ability to change spinal curvature, reduce pain, and improve disability scores. The predictive models developed within that research literature have used post-treatment lordotic angle as a primary outcome variable, and Bland-Altman analysis has been applied to assess how well predicted curvature changes match observed results in clinical populations. [5] This level of methodological rigor is unusual in manual therapy research and gives the Denneroll protocol a stronger evidence base than most postural correction tools.
In the randomized controlled trial by Bronfort and colleagues examining cervicogenic headache management, participants assigned to the experimental condition received treatment that included the Denneroll traction device alongside other interventions. That group demonstrated significant improvements in headache frequency compared to the control group at ten weeks, one year, and two years post-treatment, and the results met the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), a threshold that distinguishes statistically significant change from change that is meaningful to the patient's daily life. [8] The durability of the outcome at two years is particularly notable because structural changes to spinal curvature, once consolidated through ligamentous remodeling, tend to be self-sustaining in a way that symptom-focused interventions often are not.
At Moss Chiropractic of Inverness, the Denneroll is one component of a layered structural approach. A chiropractic adjustment performed before the orthotic session reduces joint hypomobility (restricted segmental movement) and prepares the spine to accept the corrective positioning load with less resistance. [8] Where disc-related degeneration has reduced the intervertebral space, our spinal decompression protocol is available as a complementary intervention that addresses axial compression while the Denneroll works to restore sagittal (front-to-back) alignment. The combination addresses spinal mechanics from two directions simultaneously. [5] Corrective exercise prescribed alongside Denneroll use builds the deep cervical flexor and lumbar extensor endurance needed to maintain the restored curve under functional loading conditions, translating the structural correction into lasting postural change.
Multiple systematic reviews from the Cochrane Back Review Group confirm that exercise-based care and manual interventions provide clinically meaningful benefit for spinal pain conditions, and the convergence of those findings with the Denneroll-specific trial data supports the integrated model Dr. Brett A. Moss uses. [2] [3] For patients who want to understand how their specific measurements guide a personalized care plan, the doctor's background describes Dr. Brett A. Moss's clinical background and the CBP-based approach used at this practice.
Common questions
Sources
- [1] cochrane_22972137_pmcmethods : we searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials ( rcts ) : central ( the cochrane library 2011, issue 2 ), medline, embase, and ebmr. additionally, we searched the system for information on grey literature ( sigle ), subheading biological and…
- [2] cochrane_24323844_abstractto march 2013 : central ( the cochrane library, most recent issue ), the cochrane back review group trials register, medline, embase, cinahl and pedro. selection criteria : we considered randomised controlled trials ( rcts ) that compared the effectiveness of active…
- [3] cochrane_26495910_abstractcentral ), medline, embase, three other databases, two clinical trials registries and the reference lists of included studies from inception to may 2014 for randomised controlled trials ( rcts ) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. we updated this search in june 2015, but we have…
- [4] cochrane_17943845_abstractselection criteria : we included randomized controlled trials that examined the use of customized or non - customized insoles, for the prevention or treatment of back pain, compared to placebo, no intervention or other interventions. study outcomes had to include at least one of…
- [5] haas_15363431_pmc##0. 2650. 6161. 9891. 557mlp0. 5723. 1142. 1180. 6430. 5280. 3230. 2012. 8722. 154 model performance for post - treatment lumbar lordotic angle, nrs, and odi. bland - altman analysis we performed a bland - altman analysis to assess the agreement between predicted and observed…
- [6] cochrane_14973958_pmcresults. in meta ‐ regression, the small number of observations resulted in an r2 value that did not accurately indicate the fit of the data, limiting the estimation of the disability models. in addition, the assessment of publication bias was not possible because of the lack of…
- [7] cochrane_23996271_abstract: we used the standard methodological procedures expected by the cochrane collaboration. risk of bias in each study was independently assessed by two review authors using the 12 criteria recommended by the cochrane back review group ( furlan 2009 ). dichotomous outcomes were…
- [8] bronfort_15266458_pmcwas also treated using the dennerol traction device. the experimental group had significant improvements ( p < 0. 001 ) compared to the control group at ten weeks, one and two years for headache frequency, which also reached the mcid at all timepoints. descriptive analysis :…
Find a chiropractor for Denneroll Spinal Orthotics near you
Or scan your spine first
Take a free 60-second posture screening — see where you stand.
Take a free spine screening →Find a chiropractor in your area
Chiropractor in Inverness, FL — Moss Chiropractic of Inverness →Educational content only — not a medical diagnosis. Consult a licensed healthcare provider for evaluation.
